Legal Opinion
United States v. Munsterman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 25, 1999No. 98-30140PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge:
John Munsterman was indicted and convicted for falsely representing, in connection with the acquisition of a firearm, that he was not under indictment for commission of a felony. At the time of purchase, Munsterman was under an Oregon state indictment for felony sexual abuse. He was charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6), which makes it unlawful for any person to knowingly make a false statement with respect to any fact material to the lawfulness of the sale of a firearm. His statement that he was not under indictment for a felony was made material to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Gary HancockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Ernest Franceschi, Jr. v. John ChiangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- PTI, Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2000
- Ileto v. Glock, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
- SeaRiver Maritime Financial Holdings Inc. v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.