Legal Opinion

Tanenbaum v. New York Fire Insurance Exchange

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion for injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The gravamen of the action is the attitude assumed by certain fire insurance companies towards the business of fire insurance brokers, and finding its practical expression in the *135agreement by which, the defendant Fire Insurance Exchange came into existence.

It appears that the members of this exchange, all being insurance companies, or underwriters, or representatives of such, being desirous of maintaining a uniform rate of premium for insurance within certain territorial limits, have, by their agreement of membership, bound themselves to refrain from paying commissions to a broker offering…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bohn Manufacturing Co. v. HollisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Hunt v. SimondsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
  3. Davis v. United Portable Hoisting EngineersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harding v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Edelstein v. GillmoreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. Edelstein v. GillmoreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  4. Edelstein v. GillmoreDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API