Legal Opinion

Davis v. United Portable Hoisting Engineers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by ttie defendants, the United Portable Hoisting Engineers and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 29th day of October, 189'7, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.:

The judgment appealed from in this case restrained the defendants from interfering- with, or in any manner preventing, the plaintiff from obtaining employment in his trade and occupation of hod hoisting engineer in the city of New York or elsewhere, and from procuring or coercing, by threats or otherwise, the dismissal or discharge of the plaintiff by any employer from' his employment, and further directed a money judgment for damages against the defendant, the United Portable Hoisting Engineers.

There is absolutely no foundation in the evidence for a money judgment, and the only…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Grassi Contracting Co. v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. National Protective Ass'n of Steam Fitters & Helpers v. CummingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Wunch v. ShanklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. Tanenbaum v. New York Fire Insurance ExchangeNew York Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Coons v. ChrystieNew York Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API