Legal Opinion

Bell v. Raffensperger

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 3, 2021No. S21A0306PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

311 Ga. 616

FINAL COPY S21A0306. BELL v. RAFFENSPERGER. BOGGS, Justice. Andrew Bell challenges the denial of his application for a writ of mandamus and injunctive relief in which he sought to compel Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to include Bell’s name as an independent candidate on the ballot for the November 3, 2020 election for Georgia House District 85. Bell claims, among other things, that he collected the signatures required for him to qualify as a candidate and that the trial court erred by not requiring the Secretary to place Bell’s name on the ballot. Because the November 3,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Randolph County v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. Merry v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  3. Baez v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. City of Comer v. SeymourSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  5. Palmer v. ConnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sinkfield v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  2. CATOOSA COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY v. HENRYSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
  3. MILLER v. HODGESupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
  4. Freddie Ashmon v. James R. TraskCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021
  5. TERRINEE L. GUNDY v. JAMES BALLICourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API