Legal Opinion

S.M. v. E.P.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 25, 2010No. D055230PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AARON, J.—

I

INTRODUCTION

Appellant S.M. and respondent E.P. are the parents of a toddler, C.M. S.M. and E.P. met in San Diego and lived together in San Diego, on and off, for approximately five years before C.M. was bom. In 2008, around the time E.P. became pregnant with C.M., the couple began having difficulties, and E.P. eventually returned to her home state of Iowa to give birth. She returned to San Diego a few months later with C.M. so that she and S.M. could work on their relationship.

Approximately eight months after C.M. was bom, S.M. filed a paternity and custody action in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Sacramento v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Ebensteiner Co., Inc. v. Chadmar GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Nakamura v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Davila v. Mejia (In re Davila), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. J.J. v. M.F.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Valerie G. v. Louis G.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Bornemann v. Gamboa CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Burquet v. BrumbaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API