Legal Opinion

Millard v. County of Kern

California Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1905No. L.A. No. 1547PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. Paul W. Bennett, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

The action was brought to recover from defendant. county four hundred and five dollars alleged to be due plaintiff as justice of the peace on one hundred and thirty-five criminal actions and proceedings heard before him during the month of September, 1903. The plaintiff had judgment for the amount claimed, and the defendant county appeals therefrom.

1. Appellant’s first contention is, that the complaint fails to show that the claim was presented twice to the board of supervisors, and is therefore defective.

It appears that the claim was wholly rejected on its first and only presentation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Tucker v. BarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. GunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Harvey v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Marron v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. Summerfield v. DowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API