Legal Opinion
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Arel, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided January 19, 1995No. 4:93CV01441 GFGPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
873 F.Supp. 227 (1995)
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Plaintiff,
v.
AREL, INC., Defendant.
No. 4:93CV01441 GFG.
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division.
January 19, 1995.
Peter W. Herzog, Jr., Herzog and Crebs, St. Louis, MO, for plaintiff.
Edward C. Cody, Klutho and Cody, St. Louis, MO, for defendant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GUNN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Eastman Kodak Co.'s (Kodak) motion to reconsider the July 29, 1994, order denying Kodak's motion for summary judgment on the ground of the statute of limitations. In the alternative, Kodak moves the Court to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Sherman White v. Crispus Nix Rob Glaser John Emmett James Burton Unknown/unnamed Sued as Two Unknown Bci AgentsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- O'KEEFFE v. SnyderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Van Slyke v. WorthingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Raskulinecz v. RaskulineczNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hughes Electronics Corp. v. Citibank DelawareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004