Legal Opinion
Van Slyke v. Worthington
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 18, 1992PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
265 N.J. Super. 603 (1992)
628 A.2d 386
WARREN VAN SLYKE AND BARBARA VAN SLYKE, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
WORTHINGTON, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Middlesex County.
Decided December 18, 1992.
Linton W. Turner for defendant, Carrier Corp. (Crawshaw & Mayfield, attorneys).
Douglas Brierley for defendant, Worthington Corp. (Schenk, Price, Smith & King, attorneys for Lisa K. Pantel; Douglas Brierley, on the brief).
Patrick Bartels for plaintiffs (Garruto, Galex and Cantor, attorneys).
LERNER, J.S.C.
The case before the court is on a motion for summary judgment filed on…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rosenberg v. Town of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- O'CONNOR v. Abraham AltusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Veazey v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Mellk v. SarahsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rice v. Dow Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Li Fu v. Hong FuSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Hughes Electronics Corp. v. Citibank DelawareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- R.A.C. v. P.J.S.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Amelia Woessner v. Air Liquide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.