Legal Opinion
Raskulinecz v. Raskulinecz
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 26, 1976PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
141 N.J. Super. 148 (1976)
357 A.2d 330
SUSAN RASKULINECZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOHN RASKULINECZ, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided March 26, 1976.
Mr. John P. Higgins for plaintiff (Messrs. Pettit, Higgins & Devlin, attorneys).
Mr. Elwyn Saviet for defendant (Messrs. Stevens & Mathias, attorneys).
FULOP, J.S.C.
This is a motion to dismiss the complaint under R. 4:6-2(e) or for summary judgment under R. 4:46.
Plaintiff and defendant were married to each other at the times herein referred to. In August 1972 they were residents of Plainfield, New Jersey. They went to Vermont together…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- O'KEEFFE v. SnyderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Draper v. Airco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Schum v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Montag v. Bergen Bluestone CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Earl Warner v. Auberge Gray Rocks Inn, Ltee.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.