Legal Opinion

McClelland v. Interstate Transit Lines

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1941No. 30950PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment for personal injuries and property damage resulting from an automobile accident. Defendant appeals and presents questions as to the correctness of the instructions and as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. The seriousness of the injuries and the amount of the verdict are not presented for review.

The facts are not in serious dispute. A considerable part of the facts were admitted to be true by stipulation of the parties. They are to be commended for this procedure.

The accident occurred Sunday afternoon, July 2, 1939, on east and west…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Culver v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Hutchinson v. Western Bridge & Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Merritt v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Thomas v. RasmussenNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Bocian v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Simcho v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Kroeger v. SafranekNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Pierson v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Johnson v. Anoka-Butte Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. McClelland v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API