Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Hayner
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 3, 1982No. 5335PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Wilson, a real estate broker, sued the Hayners [Hayner], owners of land, for a real estate commission. The jury rendered a verdict for Hayner and Wilson appeals from the judgment. We affirm.
Wilson claims the trial court erred (1) in denying admission of certain evidence, (2) in refusing to instruct on Hayner’s duties to Wilson, and (3) in giving certain instructions.
A. There was no error in denial of evidence.
During the course of trial, Wilson sought the admission in evidence of a warranty deed and a purchase and sales contract involving partial sales of Hayner’s land.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Iriart v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Wright v. BremNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Raab v. CasperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Embrey v. GalentinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Jennings v. TrummerOregon Supreme Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Griffin v. Guadalupe Medical Center, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Baca v. VelezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- United States v. Plains Electric Generation & Transmission Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Talley v. Security Service Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.