Legal Opinion
State v. Perry
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 6, 1962PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The defendant was convicted, after a trial to the court, of a violation of the zoning regulations of Stamford. He has appealed, claiming that the court erred in finding on all the evidence that he was guilty of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt.
The material facts are not disputed. The defendant is president of the Pickwick Ice Cream Company, which has manufactured ice cream for over twenty-five years on premises located on Newfield Avenue in Stamford. Prior to 1951, the premises were in an industrial zone. In that year, the property was rezoned to a commercial neighborhood zone, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grundlehner v. DanglerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Salerni v. ScheuySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Beerwort v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Town of Guilford v. LandonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Burmore Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- DeForest & Hotchkiss Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Kleinsmith v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Inhabitants of Town of Windham v. SpragueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Weyls v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Jobert v. MorantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.