Legal Opinion
Town of Guilford v. Landon
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 3, 1959PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The defendants have appealed from a judgment enjoining the use of their premises for a lumber business in violation of the zoning regulations of Guilford. The appeal raises the questions whether (1) the action was brought by a proper party, (2) there has been an extension of a nonconforming use in violation of the zoning regulations, (3) the alterations made in the premises by the defendants required a building permit and a certificate of occupancy, and (4) the defendants were properly enjoined from carrying on their business.
We shall consider first whether the action was brought by a proper…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Defelice v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Rommell v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Tyler v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Salerni v. ScheuySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Town of Lexington v. BeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Hyatt v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Connecticut Sand & Stone Corporation v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Helicopter Associates, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.