Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Glens Falls Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1961No. 35724PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant insurance company for reimbursement for money he had paid on a judgment in an action arising out of an automobile collision. His cause of action was predi cated. on the provisions of a policy with the defendant insurance company for public liability on his 1957 Chevrolet automobile. The policy contained a “Use of Other Automobiles” clause under which he would be covered with public indemnity while driving any automobile other than the one specifically named in the policy. The coverage, however, was limited by the following exclusionary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pacific Automobile Insurance v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ross v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ross v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Kenney v. Employees' Liability Assurance Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Whaley v. Great American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Safeco Insurance v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API