Palmer v. Glens Falls Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.
The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant insurance company for reimbursement for money he had paid on a judgment in an action arising out of an automobile collision. His cause of action was predi cated. on the provisions of a policy with the defendant insurance company for public liability on his 1957 Chevrolet automobile. The policy contained a “Use of Other Automobiles” clause under which he would be covered with public indemnity while driving any automobile other than the one specifically named in the policy. The coverage, however, was limited by the following exclusionary…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pacific Automobile Insurance v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ross v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Ross v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Kenney v. Employees' Liability Assurance Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
- Whaley v. Great American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Safeco Insurance v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.