Legal Opinion

United States v. State

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1944No. S. F. No. 16883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

The United States of America has appealed from “the Decree of Settlement of Final Account and of Final Distribution” in the estate of Carl A. Lindquist, deceased, “distributing the residue of the estate of the decedent of the Probate Code of the State of California, and denying to the State of California under the provisions of Section 1027 *700the claim of the United States of America for distribution of said residue under the provisions of Section 450 of Title 38 of the United States Code.” A hearing was granted by this court, after decision by the District Court of Appeal, First Appellate…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Lyeth v. HoeySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Miller v. Mun. Court of L. A.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Trotter v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Lawrence v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of DallyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
  2. Beard v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Beard v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API