Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Beard v. Brown

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1980No. 5162, 5163 and 5183Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McCLINTOCK, Justice,

dissenting in part and concurring in part, with whom ROSE, J., joins.

Notwithstanding the fact that the place where Mrs. Buller worked was an isolated location, removed from any available housing, and despite the fact that Frailey paid her an additional two hours compensation because of the necessity of traveling a considerable distance over unpaved and dusty roads, the majority reject the existence of even a factual question as to whether she was within the scope of her employment at the time of the accident and hold as a matter of law that Frailey had no responsibility…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Ducey v. Argo Sales Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Fruit v. SchreinerAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Luth v. Rogers and Babler Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API