Legal Opinion

Hoyle v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1970No. 18PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, C.J.

“In keeping with the expansion and development of air navigation and commerce, but recognizing the dominant right of the surface owner to fully use and enjoy his land, the courts, generally, in adjudicating the relative property rights in the airspace, have found it necessary to modify the ancient maxim of real property, ‘he who owns the soil owns it to the heavens.’ The general rule now deducible from the authorities is that the justiciable right to the exclusive possession of land extends upward only to that point necessary for the full use and enjoyment of the land and the incidents of its…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. A. J. Hodges Industries, Inc., and Union Producing Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. City of Austin v. Travis County Landfill Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Wilkie v. City of Boiling Spring LakesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  4. Smith v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Rose v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API