Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1937No. Appeals, 111 and 148PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

In 1903 Sadie Russell married Charles Thornton, and lived with him until 1916, when, without legal cause, he deserted and ceased to support her. In 1920 she bought, in her own name, premises 2518 Hallett Street, and in 1925, premises 19 (later known as 633) Conklin Street, both in Pittsburgh. These purchases were made principally out of her accumulated savings. In 1927, not having heard from her husband for eleven years, and assuming that he was dead, she entered into a marriage with James Pierce. In 1928 a deed conveying title to the two properties was executed by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bell v. LittleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Perrin v. HarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Bell v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Morris v. McCartyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  5. McKee v. BevinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. TEACHER v. KijurinaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Maxwell v. SaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Frederick, Admr. v. SouthwickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Heatter v. LucasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Bove v. BoveSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API