Legal Opinion

Heatter v. Lucas

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1951No. Appeal, 101PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Chidsey,

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County. The facts are not in dispute. The petitioner is a creditor and administrator of the estate of Joseph Lucas, deceased. During decedent’s lifetime a certain farm, situate in Washington County was deeded to “Francis Lucas, a single man, and Joseph Lucas and Matilda Lucas, his wife.” There is no pointed indication in the deed of what share was intended to pass ,to each of the grantees, the habendum clause providing, “To Have and To Hold the same unto and for the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Bramberry's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. TEACHER v. KijurinaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Stuckey v. Keefe's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  5. Mauser v. Mauser Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Nelson v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Brenner v. SukenikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. B.K. Medical Systems, Inc. Pension Plan v. Roberts (In Re Roberts)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Hercules v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Gordon's Jewelry Co. of New Jersey v. Goldstein (In Re Goldstein)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API