Dixon v. Andrew Tile & Manufacturing Corp.

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

This appeal is taken from the order of the lower court granting appellee’s motion for a new trial. Appellant contends that the lower court abused its discretion when it found that the jury verdict was against the weight of the evidence.

Appellant, Theodore R. Dixon, brought suit in assump-sit against appellee, Andrew Tile and Manufacturing Corporation, based on an alleged oral contract for real estate commissions. A jury trial began on April 4, 1973, and on April 11,1973, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Dixon in the amount of $17,000. Motions for a new trial and…