Legal Opinion
Abar v. Rogers
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 23, 1981No. Civ. 48919PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
In this action plaintiffs Charles R. Abar (hereafter for convenience, Abar) and Elizabeth M. Abar, his wife (hereafter for convenience, Elizabeth), had by an order of the superior court been declared vexatious litigants under Code of Civil Procedure sections 391-391.6. Thereafter in the action, Abar customarily appeared as “Charles R. Abar, pro. per., for Charles and Elizabeth Abar.” Abar is not licensed to practice law in the State of California. Elizabeth was not represented in the action pro se, or by a licensed attorney. Defendants Rogers, in the action, moved for a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lesser Towers, Inc. v. Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Townsend v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Garcia v. San Gabriel Ready MixtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Estate of Stewart v. OmanskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- McGregor v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
3Cited by9 opinions
- Department of Fish & Game v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Cunningham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Chico Feminist Women's Health Center v. ScullyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Baba v. BOARD OF SUP'RS OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Foster v. County of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.