Legal Opinion

Taylor v. De Vaughn

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1928No. Docket No. 4779PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HAZLETT, J., pro tem.

Defendant appeals from a judgment against him and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The order denying the new trial is not appealable (Code Civ. Proc., see. 963).

Plaintiff sued as mother of her minor son, and she alleged that she was damaged by reason of malpractice on the part of defendant, a physician and surgeon, in failing to give the minor the usual and necessary surgical care after he reduced a fracture of the minor’s left femur.

A companion action was brought against defendant by the minor for damages he alleged he suffered by reason of the alleged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hennessy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Dahlberg v. DahlbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Burritt v. Santa Barbara Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Harmon v. San Francisco & San Rafael RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Edw. L. Soule Co. v. SevertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gelini v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API