Legal Opinion

State v. Douglas

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1982No. CA 18550, SC 27810PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*518TANZER, J.

Defendant appeals her conviction of theft. She assigns as error a trial court order precluding her own testimony of alibi due to her noncompliance with statutory requirements for such evidence. The Court of Appeals upheld the trial court ruling, citing State v. Wardius, 6 Or App 391, 487 P2d 1380, rev den (1971), rev’d in part 412 US 470, 93 S Ct 2208, 37 L Ed 2d 82 (1973). We accepted her petition for review by which she contended that the sanction was impermissible under the Oregon and the federal constitutions. We find, however, that the statute is dis-positive.

I. District Court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. WardiusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. CurtisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. MaiOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Ashley v. HoytCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API