Legal Opinion
Ybarra v. Sumner
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided February 4, 1988No. CV-N-87-125-ECRPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EDWARD C. REED, Jr., Chief Judge.
The petitioner and the respondents, in response to the Court’s order, have supplied the Court with briefs regarding the potential exhaustion of count one of this petition. The Court had called for these additional briefs after it had reviewed the record in this case. After that initial review, it appeared to the Court that count one, regarding the impropriety of the M’Naughten rule, had never been placed before the state courts as a matter of procedural or substantive due process. Instead, the Court initially noted that the M’Naughten issue had been…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. HarlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Granberry v. GreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rene Santana v. Peter Fenton, Superintendent, Rahway State Prison and the Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Bean v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Rogers v. WhitleyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1988
- Antonetti v. FilsonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Augborne v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Austin v. GittereDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Bodden v. GentryDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.