Augborne v. Williams

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 * * * 9 BRIT FANUEL AUGBORNE, III, Case No. 2:19-cv-01204-KJD-BNW 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11 v. 12 BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 Before the court is respondents’ motion to dismiss Brit Fanuel Augborne, III’s pro 16 se

28 U.S.C. § 2254

habeas corpus petition because the claims are unexhausted 17 and/or conclusory (ECF No. 8). Augborne did not respond to the motion. As discussed 18 below, the motion is granted in part. 19 I. Background & Procedural History 20 In November 2014, Augborne pleaded guilty to robbery with use…