Legal Opinion

Rounsaville v. Evatt

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1987PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

The issue in this post-conviction proceeding is whether it is fatal to the validity of a guilty plea for the trial judge to fail to advise a defendant, in open court, of the constitutional right against self-incrimination.

Defendant initiated this proceeding on 7 April 1984, seeking to set aside guilty pleas to eight charges of forgery and one of receiving stolen property, entered on 23 September 1981 in the same trial court. Defendant asserted that the failure of the trial judge to advise him of his constitutional right against self-incrimination rendered the convictions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. MacKeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. TeagueTennessee Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. NealTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Johnson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Chamberlain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  5. Stephen Bernard Wlodarz v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2012

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API