Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1992PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REID, Chief Justice.

This case presents an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals, which affirmed the denial of a petition for post-conviction relief. The record shows that even though the trial court did not advise the petitioner of the right against self-incrimination, the guilty plea accepted by the trial court was knowing and voluntary; the petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to have the conviction vacated.

The due process provision of the federal constitution requires that pleas of guilty be knowing and voluntary. Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 243, 89 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. MacKeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. McClintockTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Claude Francis Roddy, Jr. v. Harold E. Black, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Archer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Momon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Blankenship v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. TurnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  5. Powers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API