State v. Neal
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAM S. RUSSELL, Special Justice.
This appeal presents the issue of whether or not the failure of a trial judge to articulate to a guilty-pleading defendant the full litany of rights mandated to be given in such a proceeding ipso facto renders a resulting judgment of conviction void; and, if not, what test of validity is applied. We hold that such a judgment is not necessarily void, and is subject to scrutiny under the harmless error doctrine, to ascertain whether or not the guilty plea was in fact voluntary and made with adequate knowledge by the accused of the rights being given up…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Archer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Adkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Blankenship v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. StephensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.