Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Blue Cross of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 2001No. A089824PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARRILLI, J.

The Code of Civil Procedure empowers arbitrators in certain cases to impose the discovery sanctions available in superior court. In this case, we hold that an arbitrator’s refusal to impose a discovery sanction provides no ground to vacate the arbitration award, even if the sanction is mandatory under the discovery statutes.

Maureen H. Alexander appeals from a judgment confirming an arbitration award in favor of Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross). Alexander contends the award should have been vacated because the arbitrator exceeded his powers by refusing to deem that Blue…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Coast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. Blue CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Evans v. CENTERSTONE DEVELOPMENT CO.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Berglund v. Arthroscopic & Laser Surgery Center of San Diego, L.P.California Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum Authority v. CC PartnersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Glassman v. McNabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API