Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Cook

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 3, 1951No. 34112PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUTTRELL, Y.C.J.

This is an action brought by plaintiffs Maude Cook and Virgil M. Cook, husband and wife, against Harrison E. Evans and other defendants, seeking to partition the surface and one-half of the mineral rights in three separate tracts of land in Washita county. The defendants in their answer and cross-petition prayed the court to partition the surface only for the reason that there was a great present value, and a prospect for an unusual increase in the value, of the oil and gas rights; that the value thereof placed the mineral rights beyond the ability of the defendants to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. StanfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Sweeney v. Bay State Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Coker v. ViersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Colonial Royalties Co. v. HindsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  5. Thomason v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stewart v. StewartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Harper v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Jones v. HaytonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Starnes v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  5. Coon v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API