Legal Opinion

Jones v. Hayton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1958No. 38142PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is an appeal under the provisions of 12 O.Supp.1957 Sec. 956.1 et seq. from the District Court of Noble County, Oklahoma, and involves the question of the distribution of the net proceeds from the sale of a farm, in a partition proceeding, in which the minerals had been severed from the surface. There are sixty (60) owners, fifty-four (54) of whom owned a portion of both surface and minerals, and six of whom owned only a mineral interest. The plaintiffs in error owned and undivided one-half interest in the minerals but no interest in the surface.

The undisputed facts are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. Illinois Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Batchelder v. MunroeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  3. Coker v. ViersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Vollum v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  5. Ellis v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Keith v. KeithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API