Legal Opinion

Colonial Royalties Co. v. Hinds

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 5, 1948No. 33179PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, V.C.J.

This action in partition was instituted by the following named plaintiffs who are defendants in error here and who were the owners of the following undivided interests in the surface and in the oil, gas and other minerals in a 160-acre tract of land in Lincoln county, Oklahoma, to wit:

Surface Minerals

Edd S. Hinds 9/87 459/6960

Manuel P. Hinds 9/87 93/1740

Ida V. Paxton 9/87 93/1740

Mary E. Tennison 9/87 9/87

In December, 1925, the defendant, Colonial Royalties Company, acquired an undivided 1/16 or a 10-acre interest in the minerals in and under said lands from one Russell Cobb…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fry v. DeweesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Richards v. ShearerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Wolfe v. StanfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Turner v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Shaffer v. Kansas Farmers Union Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Schnitt v. McKellarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Rebein v. Cornerstone Creek Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. Eaton v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Strait v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Williams v. NealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API