General Automotive Manufacturing Co. v. Singer
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
Appellant’s brief informs us, “The evidence adduced at the trial was for the most part without dispute and, therefore, the trial court’s findings are not conclusive upon appeal,” citing Weigell v. Gregg (1915), 161 Wis. 413, 154 N. W. 645, and other cases. Insofar as it per*530tains to undisputed evidence we agree with this proposition. We have carefully reviewed the evidence and have ourselves reached conclusions as stated by the trial court and set forth in its findings of fact, as follows:
“3. That heretofore and on or about the 28th day of March, 1953, the plaintiff hired and employed the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gauger v. HintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Faultersack v. Clintonville Sales Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Weigell v. GreggWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Bank of California v. HoffmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Bockemuhl v. JordanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Rowen v. Le Mars Mut. Ins. Co. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Science Accessories Corp. v. Summagraphics Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- United States of America Ex Rel., Harold R. Fine v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. Bechtel Petroleum Operations, Inc. And Williams Brothers Engineering Company, United States of America Ex Rel., Harold R. Fine v. The University of California, and the Board of Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Case v. MurdockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Hartford Elevator, Inc. v. LauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.