Legal Opinion

Bell v. South Cent. Bell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 27, 1990No. 88-554PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a summary judgment for the defendant, South Central Bell ("SCB"), in an action arising from the termination of Roy Bell's employment with SCB. The question presented is whether manuals prepared by SCB created an employment contract between Roy and SCB.

SCB hired Roy, a recovering alcoholic, to implement and supervise a program known as the "employee assistance program," which was designed to assist SCB employees who had drinking problems. During the course of his employment with SCB, Roy had access to two publications that, he contends, created a contract of employment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Hinrichs v. Tranquilaire HospitalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Meeks v. OPP Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Mayo v. AndressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Reynolds Metals Company v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Allied Supply Co., Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Ex Parte Amoco Fabrics and Fibers Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Campisi v. Scoles Cadillac, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API