Legal Opinion
Fox v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 28, 1978No. 77 Civ. 5769 (MP)PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
POLLACK, District Judge.
This is a motion by defendants for a stay of this lawsuit pending an arbitration which has been demanded by defendants.
In this action, plaintiff James E. Fox seeks damages on account of the determination by defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (Merrill Lynch) that Fox has forfeited his right to a pension from Merrill Lynch. Defendants’ application for a stay is made pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 3. Arbitration of the dispute is sought under an agreement that disputes of the parties should be settled in accordance with Rule 347 of the New York Stock…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dale S. COENEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. W. PRESSPRICH & CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Stirling Homex Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Fisser v. International BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Amato v. BernardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Fisher v. A.G. Becker Paribas Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,309 Clarance B. Dickinson, a v. Heinold Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- J. Donald GOODWIN, Appellant, v. ELKINS & CO., Robert G. Hayden, Richard Sichenzio, and Gabriel F. Nagy, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Amato v. BernardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.