Legal Opinion

Fink v. Kasler Corp.

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 1982No. 8042PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

TANAKA, J.

This is a negligence action arising from a two-car accident. Plaintiff-appellant Arthur Fink (A. Fink) and fourth-party defendant-appellant John Fink (J. Fink) appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint and finding J. Fink liable for the damages to third-party defendant-appellee Hachiro Funayama (Funayama). Defendant-third party plaintiff-appellee Kasler Corporation (Kasler) was deemed free of liability.

The only issue we need to decide on appeal is whether, as a road construction contractor for the State of Hawaii (State), Kasler owed to the traveling…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Wagshal v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Dudum v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Weber v. Towner CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  5. Carreira v. Territory of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Long v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  3. Brown v. All-Tech Inv. Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. White v. SabatinoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2006
  5. Lansdell v. County of KauaiHawaii Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API