Legal Opinion

Lansdell v. County of Kauai

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2006No. 26415PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

In this consolidated appeal, we hold that (1) Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) chapter 520, 1 the Hawai'i Recreational Use Statute, does not apply to Defendant-Appellee County of Kaua'i (the County), as an adjacent owner of “land,” or to lands owned by the government, including lands owned by Defendant-Appellee State of Hawai'i (the State); (2) the County did not have a duty to warn Plaintiff-Appellant Robert Lansdell (Lansdell) of any dangers associated with diving in Queen’s Bath, an ocean tide pool (Queen’s Bath or tide pool); (3) the County did not…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. KekaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Franks v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. KalamaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Saranillio v. SilvaHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Laeroc Waikiki Parkside, LLC v. K.S.K. (Oahu) Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Abadilla v. IwataHawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Thompson v. Kyo-Ya Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Thompson v. Kyo-Ya Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API