Legal Opinion

Eaker v. International Shoe Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 10, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaRKSON, J.

At tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence and at tbe close of all tbe evidence, tbe defendants made motions for judgment as in ease of nonsuit. C. S., 567. Tbe court below overruled tbe motions, and in tbis we see no error.

Tbe plaintiff wben injured was an employee and working in tbe bleacb-room of tbe tannery plant of tbe defendant, International Sboe Company. It was admitted tbat tbe defendant, Robey Small, was foreman and superintendent of said department and tbe immediate superior of plaintiff, and it was tbe -duty of plaintiff to perform bis work under tbe direction and in accordance witb tbe…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Carpet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Womble v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Ross v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Bowden v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Call v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Spivey v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Young v. Anchor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Mintz v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API