State Ex Rel. West v. Balzer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Brror from Superior Court, Garfield County; Dan Bluett, Judge. Quo warranto by the State, on the relation of Charles West, Atty. Gen., against George Balzer and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Per curiam
This proceeding in error is to review the action of the trial court wherein the Attorney General, on relation of the state, instituted an action in the nature of quo warranto to oust certain school district officials. A certain consolidated school district, known as Consolidated School District No. 2, on appeal from the superintendent of public instruction to the board of county commissioners, was divided into four school districts, and the officers of said several school districts were sought to be ousted in said proceeding. The relief sought by the Attorney General was denied in the lower…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- School District No. 17 v. ZedikerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
- Huddleston v. AskeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- State Ex Rel. Kernachan v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. WorrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Evinger v. DukeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- Board of Com'rs v. Woodford Consolidated School Dist. No. 36Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Cleal v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- McCutcheon v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929