Legal Opinion
Warner v. Trombetta
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 6, 1972No. Civ. 71-438PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEALON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have initiated this class action on behalf of themselves and all others similarily situated1 seeking injunctive relief and the convening of a three-judge court to declare Sections 616 (a)(3) and 1417(b) of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Code unconstitutional in that they are violative of the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court being satisfied that the necessary jurisdictional prerequisites had been met, this statutory three-judge court was convened under 28 U.S.C. § 2281. Bailey v. Patterson, 369 U.S. 31,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Redmond v. BagbyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Lillios v. Justices of New Hampshire District CourtDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1990
- Pollard v. PanoraDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.