Johnston v. Clements
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Neosho District Court. At the April Term, 1879, of the district court, Clements,. as plaintiff, had judgment against Johnston and another, as defendants, who bring the case to this court. The nature of the action, and the facts, sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
VALENTINE, J.:
This was an action brought by Francis-P. Clements against Alfred Johnston and Samuel Knott, as partners, for damages resulting from the death of the plaintiff’s mare, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant Knott. The case was tried in the court below by a jury, and the principal questions of fact tried by the jury are as follows:
*3771. Were Johnston and Knott partners?
2. Was Knott guilty of negligence?
3. And if Knott was guilty of negligence, was his negligence the cause of the death of the mare?
There were some errors…
2Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Von KleinOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- City of Overland Park v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Graves v. BonnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Mechanics' Savings Bank v. HardingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.