Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 11, 1922No. 23,806PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Stafford district court; Daniel A. Banta, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of attempting “to forcibly ravish and carnally know” Naomi Moore, a woman over eighteen years of age.

1. The defendant filed a motion to quash the information. The motion was overruled, and the defendant insists that the motion should have been sustained. The information was drawn under sections 3392 and 3328 of the General Statutes of 1915. Section 3392 in part reads as follows:

“Every person who shall be convicted of rape ... by forcibly ravishing any woman of the age of eighteen years…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. NeilIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  2. People v. NorringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Devoy v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Baughman v. PennSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. State v. AbbottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. State v. AndreasonIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. State v. ZeilingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API