Williams v. Arcoa International, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The dispositive issue in this interlocutory appeal is whether the district court has “jurisdiction over the person” of the four defendants. See § 21-1-1(12) (b), N.M.S. A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 4).
The record indicates that plaintiffs rented a van, in Michigan from Michigan (U-Haul Co. of Michigan, a corporation). The amended complaint alleges that while operating the van two of its wheels came off, with a resultant loss of control, causing injury to the plaintiffs. At oral argument, it was represented that this accident occurred in Missouri.
We are not concerned with the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- David Neifeld v. Meyer Steinberg. David Neifeld v. Meyer SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Elizabeth Taylor v. Portland Paramount CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Meeker v. WalkerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Board of Com'rs v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Winward v. Holly Creek Mills, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tipton v. Texaco, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Capco Acquisub, Inc. v. Greka Energy Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- Kuhlman Equipment Co. v. Tammermatic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Matter of JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Arcoa International, Inc. v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.