Legal Opinion

Kuhlman Equipment Co. v. Tammermatic, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 26, 1981No. 8251-5-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.

The dispositive question presented by this appeal is whether the defense of lack of personal jurisdiction is waived by a defendant who seeks affirmative relief in the form of a cross claim against third party defendants. The issue arises in the context of a foreign corporation's contention that it is not subject to suit in Washington because the claim for relief arises out of the conduct of, and service was made upon, a subsidiary corporation which merged with the parent foreign corporation prior to the lawsuit's filing.

The relevant facts are as follows: Appellant Kuhlman Equipment Co., a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  2. David Neifeld v. Meyer Steinberg. David Neifeld v. Meyer SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  3. Matthies v. KnodelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  4. Sanders v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Globig v. Greene & Gust Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Grange Insurance Ass'n v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Voicelink Data Services, Inc. v. Datapulse, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  3. French v. GabrielWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. Omega Painting, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. In Re the Marriage of ParksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API