Kuhlman Equipment Co. v. Tammermatic, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.
The dispositive question presented by this appeal is whether the defense of lack of personal jurisdiction is waived by a defendant who seeks affirmative relief in the form of a cross claim against third party defendants. The issue arises in the context of a foreign corporation's contention that it is not subject to suit in Washington because the claim for relief arises out of the conduct of, and service was made upon, a subsidiary corporation which merged with the parent foreign corporation prior to the lawsuit's filing.
The relevant facts are as follows: Appellant Kuhlman Equipment Co., a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- David Neifeld v. Meyer Steinberg. David Neifeld v. Meyer SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Matthies v. KnodelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Sanders v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Globig v. Greene & Gust Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Grange Insurance Ass'n v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Voicelink Data Services, Inc. v. Datapulse, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- French v. GabrielWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. Omega Painting, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re the Marriage of ParksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.