Legal Opinion

Blut v. Katz

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 3, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Clapp, S. J. A. D.

This action was brought by the executrix of Isaac Blut against his two surviving partners for, among other things, an account as to his interest in the partnership. The defendants have continued the business, acknowledging, it is said, an obligation to pay plaintiff whatever is found to have been the value of Blut’s interest as of his death. From a judgment awarding her a sum for the value of this interest, she appeals.

We deal with two points. The trial court held that the partnership estate is not a “fund in court” (R. R. 4:55-7(b))…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Equitable Trust Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Malden Trust Co. v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Andrews v. StinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Jackson v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blut v. KatzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API