Legal Opinion
Blut v. Katz
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 3, 1955PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
36 N.J. Super. 185 (1955)
115 A.2d 119
GUSSIE BLUT, AS EXECUTRIX UNDER THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF ISAAC BLUT, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, AND CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
BENJAMIN KATZ AND HERMAN MARKS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 2, 1955.
Decided June 3, 1955.
Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. Harry Chashin argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Marcus & Levy, attorneys; Mr. Hyman W. Rosenthal on the brief).
Mr. Harry Nadell argued the cause for defendants-respondents.
The opinion of the court was…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- United States v. Equitable Trust Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Katz v. FarberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Malden Trust Co. v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Thomas Ex Rel. Schmidt v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Grober v. KahnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- In Re Broad Street National Bank of TrentonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Lipin v. ZiffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Bush v. RikerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.