Wigger v. Olson
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., CON-NOR, BOOOHEVER and FITZGERALD, JJ., and DIMOND, J. Pro Tem. DIMOND, Justice Pro Tem.
The sole question raised on this appeal is the alleged failure of the trial court to make specific findings of fact and conclusions of law resolving the various issues raised by the pleadings and conflicting testimony.
In his original complaint the appellant, Wigger, claimed a partnership existed consisting of himself and appellees Olson, Klemm and Fairchild. He sought dissolution of the partnership and an accounting. In an amended complaint Wigger alleged alternatively…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- David Irish, a Minor, by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem, Clifford L. Irish, and Clifford L. Irish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Graham v. RockmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Dickerson v. GeiermannAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Uchitel Co. v. Telephone Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Lee v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Swift v. KniffenAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Sloan v. JeffersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Curran v. HastreiterAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.