Legal Opinion

Uchitel Co. v. Telephone Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1982No. 5687PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

This appeal finds its origin in appellants’ alleged breach of a contract which required the appellee to manufacture and install an office telephone system. 1

1. Facts

In February 1978, Robert Uchitel contacted The Telephone Company (TTC) concerning development of a new office phone system primarily for Visions. Rodger Davis, sales representative for TTC, then met with Robert Uchitel to discuss the phone system. As a result of this meeting TTC worked up a proposal, dated March 8,1978, designed to meet Uchitel’s specifications. Uchitel then advised that if certain…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Henderson v. SECURITY MORTAGAGE AND FINANCE CO.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Adoption of v. M. C.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Cooper v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Otis Elevator Company v. McLaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Elliott v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. L.D.G., Inc. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. McKibben v. Mohawk Oil Co., Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Casciola v. F.S. Air Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Lee v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Swift v. KniffenAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API