Legal Opinion
Robert Baskin v. Richard Clark, Superintendent, and Indiana Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 4, 1992No. 90-3699PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
Robert Baskin appeals from the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Baskin sought the writ arguing that an inculpato-ry statement admitted against him at trial was obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). He claims he had not waived his right to remain silent when the statement was made. The district court denied Baskin’s petition holding that the statement in question was voluntary and was not obtained in violation of Miranda. We affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hedrick G. Humphries v. Cbocs West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gabriel Valdez ANDAVERDE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Bui v. DiPaoloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Charles T. Lord v. Jack DuckworthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Edward B. Betts, Randy J. Lane, and Judy K. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.