Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Pfeifer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1995No. 72,441PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

The issue before us is whether court-ordered spousal maintenance automatically ceases upon the recipient spouse’s remarriage.

The Quints were divorced in June 1991. Mr. Quint was ordered to pay spousal maintenance in the amount of $125 per month for a period of 30 months, “so long as the petitioner [did] not remarry or cohabitate with a member of the opposite sex.” On December 31, 1991, the petitioner remarried and became Mrs. Pfeifer.

Quint filed a completed, but uncertified, copy of Pfeifer’s marriage license with the trial court that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Foulk v. Colonial TerraceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  2. Sweeney v. Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  3. Brady v. BradySupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  4. Herzmark v. HerzmarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. Dodd v. DoddSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Tax Appeal of KarstenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
  2. Saroff v. HaunCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API